Cricket World Cup

Xanthippe · Post by **Xanthippe** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:06 pm

Broken Wing wrote:I'm a newcomer to this but as I always say, there are no stupid questions, just stupid people.

England only had 8 out. Does that mean Ireland can't have more than 8 out?

Never mind - already answered

Sea_point · Post by **Sea_point** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:09 pm

Jesus, every time Cusack swings my hear races.. He needs to take up the reins a little to give Kev a break, but not chase the runs....

Broken Wing · Post by **Broken Wing** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:11 pm

Thanks Hornet (and Xanthippe).

Come on Kev! Just 2 more....

sarah_lennon · Post by **sarah_lennon** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:12 pm

need 65 from 60 balls

Hornet · Post by **Hornet** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:13 pm

O'Brien scores fastest 100 in World Cup History.

sarah_lennon · Post by **sarah_lennon** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:13 pm

Hornet wrote:O'Brien scores fastest 100 in World Cup History.

amazing!

Hornet · Post by **Hornet** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:13 pm

56 needed from 54 Balls.

Broken Wing · Post by **Broken Wing** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:15 pm

Fantastic!

Come on Ireland!

Sea_point · Post by **Sea_point** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:15 pm

Right Kev 100 got

, back to business. Won't mean jack unless you push on for the won.....

Sea_point · Post by **Sea_point** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:17 pm

Shite, bad lack of concentration. 275/6 AFTER 42. Decent dig by Cusck though. C'mon lads FOCUS......

sarah_lennon · Post by **sarah_lennon** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:17 pm

wicket!

Hornet · Post by **Hornet** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:20 pm

Cusak run out. O'Brien scored 100 runs of 28 scoring strokes. He had 22 dot balls (non scoring deliveries). So 100 off 50 balls.

Sea_point · Post by **Sea_point** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:22 pm

C'mon Mooney, keep your sh*t together. He's all over the fecking shop, that's a really worry as it will unsettle O'Brien more than losing Cusack...

Need to keep the momentum up or the pressure will increase as the run rate rises.....

tackle-bag · Post by **tackle-bag** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:23 pm

Calm heads required now. Mooney just needs to act as a foil for O'Brien and not try anything too fancy for a few overs. We all know that Trent can hit a few sixes if needs be, but we're not going to win this game if it requires Dockrell or Rankin to reach any sort of score.

Scrum 5 · Post by **Scrum 5** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:24 pm

Anyone know where you can hear commentary or see the match on the net?

BBC can't stream outside the UK for this.

Sea_point · Post by **Sea_point** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:29 pm

C'mon lads punish the bad balls to the boundary. Don't want to see O'Brien running too much at this stage....

Hornet · Post by **Hornet** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:31 pm

Scrum 5 wrote:Anyone know where you can hear commentary or see the match on the net?

BBC can't stream outside the UK for this.

I'm listening to it on BBC 5 Live Extra on the Television via my UPC Cable feed here in D24.

tackle-bag · Post by **tackle-bag** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:34 pm

Starting to think that Trent should have been sent in there ahead of Mooney. I appreciate that TJ sometimes gives his wicket away cheaply, but he's well able to smack it over the fence on his good days.

Xanthippe · Post by **Xanthippe** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:35 pm

Nerves are gone at this stage. It's no fun 'watching' on Yahoo Cricket but at least it means I can watch without the boss knowing!

Hornet · Post by **Hornet** » March 2nd, 2011, 4:37 pm

300 - 6. 28 to win in 25 Balls.

Babbling 'brook

Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup

Re: Cricket World Cup