Niall Kiely

mack539 · Post by **mack539** » May 2nd, 2009, 10:39 am

One word w*nk*r

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/spo ... 40806.html

Danthefan · Post by **Danthefan** » May 2nd, 2009, 10:42 am

One more topic moaning about the media and I am going to cry.

Dave Cahill · Post by **Dave Cahill** » May 2nd, 2009, 10:51 am

A supporter from either side was asked to write a piece for the Times today. Ours chose to write about our team and supporters and theirs chose to write about ours as well

Donny B. · Post by **Donny B.** » May 2nd, 2009, 10:51 am

Jesus, even by Munster fans standards, that is one smug tosser!!

Ah well, who cares, just another tw@t to add to the considerable pile!

Dave Cahill · Post by **Dave Cahill** » May 2nd, 2009, 10:52 am

Donny B. wrote:Jesus, even by Munster fans standards, that is one smug tosser!!

Ah well, who cares, just another tw@t to add to the dressing room wall

mfjoc · Post by **mfjoc** » May 2nd, 2009, 10:54 am

Thought it was brilliant
He use every possible steriotype about us

Provincial Towns · Post by **Provincial Towns** » May 2nd, 2009, 10:59 am

Less of the personal abuse lads. His arguments are valid.

The Big Stick · Post by **The Big Stick** » May 2nd, 2009, 11:02 am

He's really shown us what it is to be a redcoat.
I couldn't believe he could be so stupid to insult us on matchday the way he did,
ammunition for the wall and all that.

Slipper1 · Post by **Slipper1** » May 2nd, 2009, 11:02 am

Provincial Towns wrote:Less of the personal abuse lads. His arguments are valid.

Some of his points are completely factually incorrect - sure why let the facts get in the way of a good lash at Leinster.

Leinsterman · Post by **Leinsterman** » May 2nd, 2009, 11:03 am

Provincial Towns wrote:Less of the personal abuse lads. His arguments are valid.

It's not an argument though. That's the problem. It's poorly written and he comes across as one of those who will smugly crow all the way back to the city centre if Munster win.

Donny B. · Post by **Donny B.** » May 2nd, 2009, 11:06 am

Provincial Towns wrote:Less of the personal abuse lads. His arguments are valid.

You taking the f**king piss?

Christ when you're siding with this arrogant w&%ker against your own you really know you have self esteem issues!

The self-hating Leinster fan, how pathetic!

Bet you can't wait for us to get hammered so you can come on here with the "I told you so"s

Dave Cahill · Post by **Dave Cahill** » May 2nd, 2009, 11:07 am

Ah leave PT alone, hes having a bad day...

David Kelly in the Indo wrote:Any calls for Cheika's head -- even if by predominantly hairy loners on internet chat rooms -

RoboProp · Post by **RoboProp** » May 2nd, 2009, 12:38 pm

That was a terrible article. Turgid with a silent g...turid? Oh, and a silent i too.

papachino · Post by **papachino** » May 2nd, 2009, 1:28 pm

Good thing hes not working for them anymore....

What an arrogant shite.... These guy are clearly paid to write on a certain topic,
i would blame the paper just as much as the journalist!!

Any leinster biased papers should not be purchased, and there sites should not be viewed by
any sane Rugby fan....

neiliog93 · Post by **neiliog93** » May 2nd, 2009, 1:32 pm

My Lord, that was really awful. one of the worst I've ever seen.

We're often way too precious on here about the media having a go at Leinster, but this d!%khead is way over the top.

suisse · Post by **suisse** » May 2nd, 2009, 1:56 pm

Dave Cahill wrote:A supporter from either side was asked to write a piece for the Times today. Ours chose to write about our team and supporters and theirs chose to write about ours as well

Hmmmmmmm....... the man describes Leinster as being disillusioned, but surely that is the word to describe him as a "fan"? His rant has about 15 paragraphs, and there are 2 half-paragraphs about Munster; one is confirmation of his booking on the ferry to Scotland; and the second is the passionate fans who have been from Lille to the Backhand. But this Munster fan, classing himself in the same catagory as other Munster fans, spends his article talking about Leinster, and their fans. That's PASSION for you.

Munster may win this evening, they most probably will, and good luck to them. But Niall Kiely will always remain a loser.

ellandleinster · Post by **ellandleinster** » May 2nd, 2009, 2:06 pm

why does everything have to be so polar. the guy wrote a piece you don't like so he's a complete tosser?? Was there not a grain of truth in some of it? Totally agree that it was foolhardy to write it today but don't just dismiss all of it out of hand.

Provincial Towns · Post by **Provincial Towns** » May 2nd, 2009, 4:34 pm

Slipper1 wrote:
Provincial Towns wrote:Less of the personal abuse lads. His arguments are valid.
Some of his points are completely factually incorrect - sure why let the facts get in the way of a good lash at Leinster.

Whats incorrect? its over the top but based on valid points.

It certainly doesnt warrant the personal abuse here. It makes us look pathetic that we cant swallow it and see if the team can respond on the pitch.

olaf the fat · Post by **olaf the fat** » May 2nd, 2009, 11:56 pm

Sorry lads, but that article deserves a bump

zabbo · Post by **zabbo** » May 2nd, 2009, 11:57 pm

Read this earlier on the way to the game, in what was a nice 4 pager in the times, and then this trash - nothing short of a disgrace.

The Blue View, I thought was incredibly well written

Babbling 'brook

Niall Kiely

Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely

Re: Niall Kiely