Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

A forum for true blue Leinster supporters to talk about and support their team

Moderator: moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Logorrhea
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4669
Joined: October 2nd, 2007, 1:20 pm
Location: D24

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by Logorrhea »

simonokeeffe wrote:its where theyre planning to put away fans
Soccer segregates, rugby doesn't.
User avatar
AdamK
Rhys Ruddock
Posts: 2625
Joined: May 15th, 2011, 11:11 pm

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by AdamK »

I'd say it'd be very difficult allright, considering the north and south stands are basically just scaffolding.
jimbobjoe
Mullet
Posts: 1308
Joined: September 16th, 2009, 9:23 pm

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by jimbobjoe »

nc6000 wrote:
Blue Voodoo wrote:As the RDS are the ones planning the improvements I imagine one of the assumptions is that the north and south stands have to come down for the Horse show so covering them unlikely
How much harder can it be to cover the North & South ends even if they are only temporary?
Quite hard I imagine. The cover over the grandstand requires large concrete foundations at the back to anchor them in the event of heavy winds/heavy snowfall or various other worst case scenarios. H&S wouldn't allow a big tent over a couple thousand people if it's not got a permanent grounding.
User avatar
blockhead
Rob Kearney
Posts: 7802
Joined: December 14th, 2011, 1:20 pm
Location: Up Your Stairs!

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by blockhead »

A roof over the ends would make it a lot more attractive to the more casual of supporters. Could pay for itself fairly quickly me thinks.
BTW what is the capacity of the behind goal seating at the present time?
You know I'm going to lose,
And gambling's for fools,
But that's the way I like it baby, I don't want to live FOREVER!
User avatar
johng
Gordon D'Arcy
Posts: 18883
Joined: March 23rd, 2009, 10:37 pm
Location: Behind You!!

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by johng »

More than half of the stadium capacity is in the north and south stands.
User avatar
Peg Leg
Rob Kearney
Posts: 9823
Joined: February 1st, 2010, 5:08 pm
Location: Procrastinasia
Contact:

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by Peg Leg »

johng wrote:More than half of the stadium capacity is in the north and south stands.
But all the riff raff :lol: :lol:

See what i did there?
I am on fire...... high five me.... oh yeah!!!
"It was Mrs O'Leary's cow"
Daniel Sullivan
User avatar
artaneboy
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4173
Joined: January 25th, 2011, 7:46 pm
Location: closer than you think...

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by artaneboy »

Peg Leg wrote:
johng wrote:More than half of the stadium capacity is in the north and south stands.
But all the riff raff :lol: :lol:

See what i did there?
I am on fire...... high five me.... oh yeah!!!
Eh... No! :oops:
"Oh, I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused!"
User avatar
johng
Gordon D'Arcy
Posts: 18883
Joined: March 23rd, 2009, 10:37 pm
Location: Behind You!!

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by johng »

Can I change that to "around" half of the stadium capacity. Might be just below half.

Grandstand is the smallest and Anglsea is the biggest. 1000 in the terrace brings it up.
User avatar
simonokeeffe
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 16777
Joined: July 21st, 2011, 3:04 am
Location: Dublin
Contact:

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by simonokeeffe »

Logorrhea wrote:
simonokeeffe wrote:its where theyre planning to put away fans
Soccer segregates, rugby doesn't.
union v league was invented to keep the huddled masses away :)

meant more of a case of most assigned seating venues give the worst/last to sell otherwise tickets to away fans
Retired from babbling. Can be found on twittter @okeeffesimon
User avatar
[Jackass]
Seán Cronin
Posts: 3646
Joined: April 14th, 2008, 2:40 pm
Location: D4tress

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by [Jackass] »

Regarding the roof, it should definitely be all the way around in my opinion, as a complete seperate structure to the removeable stads.

Support base could come from the ground around where the flood lights are and the corners could be scured by the towers or whatever they are on each side of the stand.

It would make the stadium not only look a lot better, but in terms of facilities make it a much better stadium.

People are a lot more likely to buy season tickets in covered seating, many don't care about it being open, but many definitely would have a preference for covered stands etc.
Pro12 Champions, Amlin Challenge Cup Champions, British & Irish Cup Champions
User avatar
Xanthippe
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4455
Joined: September 5th, 2008, 6:48 pm

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by Xanthippe »

blockhead wrote:A roof over the ends would make it a lot more attractive to the more casual of supporters. Could pay for itself fairly quickly me thinks.
BTW what is the capacity of the behind goal seating at the present time?
johng wrote:More than half of the stadium capacity is in the north and south stands.
Here's our best guess at the current numbers for each stand:

Anglesea Stand = 4320

Grandstand = 4857

Terrace = 1000

North Stand = 4200

South Stand = 4200

http://forum.leinsterfans.com/viewtopic ... y&start=60
#LiveLifeLoveLeinster

#BeSeenBeHeardBeBlueBELIEVE



I'm a Book Mark and damn proud of it. Storm 1:08 forever
User avatar
blockhead
Rob Kearney
Posts: 7802
Joined: December 14th, 2011, 1:20 pm
Location: Up Your Stairs!

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by blockhead »

Xanthippe wrote:
blockhead wrote:A roof over the ends would make it a lot more attractive to the more casual of supporters. Could pay for itself fairly quickly me thinks.
BTW what is the capacity of the behind goal seating at the present time?
johng wrote:More than half of the stadium capacity is in the north and south stands.
Here's our best guess at the current numbers for each stand:

Anglesea Stand = 4320

Grandstand = 4857

Terrace = 1000

North Stand = 4200

South Stand = 4200

http://forum.leinsterfans.com/viewtopic ... y&start=60
Thanks Xanthippe.
8,400 fans behind the posts. A cover should be considered. This is where most of the "lets go to see Leinster this weekend" crowd sit, lots of families, underage club teams too.
So there you go Mr.Dawson, we want;
a. Roofing over the north & south stands.
b. A terrace for the Ultras. :roll:
c. Cheaper pints.
d. More urinals.
e. All Leinster games to be on the telly.
f. Halftime entertainment with lots of lovely girls.
Have i missed anything?
You know I'm going to lose,
And gambling's for fools,
But that's the way I like it baby, I don't want to live FOREVER!
User avatar
icebaby
Rhys Ruddock
Posts: 2338
Joined: August 23rd, 2006, 9:09 pm
Location: Dun Laoghaire, Dublin, Leinster

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by icebaby »

Is this really being considered seriously ? Looks like a cartoon stadium to me
"Look what Leinster have done again"
User avatar
nc6000
Mullet
Posts: 1987
Joined: June 25th, 2007, 8:17 pm

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by nc6000 »

blockhead wrote:
Xanthippe wrote:
blockhead wrote:A roof over the ends would make it a lot more attractive to the more casual of supporters. Could pay for itself fairly quickly me thinks.
BTW what is the capacity of the behind goal seating at the present time?
johng wrote:More than half of the stadium capacity is in the north and south stands.
Here's our best guess at the current numbers for each stand:

Anglesea Stand = 4320

Grandstand = 4857

Terrace = 1000

North Stand = 4200

South Stand = 4200

http://forum.leinsterfans.com/viewtopic ... y&start=60
Thanks Xanthippe.
8,400 fans behind the posts. A cover should be considered. This is where most of the "lets go to see Leinster this weekend" crowd sit, lots of families, underage club teams too.
So there you go Mr.Dawson, we want;
a. Roofing over the north & south stands.
b. A terrace for the Ultras. :roll:
c. Cheaper pints.
d. More urinals.
e. All Leinster games to be on the telly.
f. Halftime entertainment with lots of lovely girls.
Have i missed anything?
Are we happy with the stadium announcer?
User avatar
blockhead
Rob Kearney
Posts: 7802
Joined: December 14th, 2011, 1:20 pm
Location: Up Your Stairs!

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by blockhead »

g. Kathleen Turner for stadium announcer!
You know I'm going to lose,
And gambling's for fools,
But that's the way I like it baby, I don't want to live FOREVER!
User avatar
[Jackass]
Seán Cronin
Posts: 3646
Joined: April 14th, 2008, 2:40 pm
Location: D4tress

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by [Jackass] »

The fact that a stadium announcer is even noticed, let alone discussed, is proof that they are doing a sh*t job. Really? Do we really need to worry about someone who's job it is to announce the teams and read out the scores? Short of getting Steve Walsh to do it, I don't think we could get a more attention whoring individual. I know Leinster fans made an issue of how he used to almost mock apposing teams when announcing a winning Leinster score and he's stopped, but still, I hate the fool.
Pro12 Champions, Amlin Challenge Cup Champions, British & Irish Cup Champions
User avatar
Xanthippe
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4455
Joined: September 5th, 2008, 6:48 pm

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by Xanthippe »

[Jackass] wrote:The fact that a stadium announcer is even noticed, let alone discussed, is proof that they are doing a sh*t job. Really? Do we really need to worry about someone who's job it is to announce the teams and read out the scores? Short of getting Steve Walsh to do it, I don't think we could get a more attention whoring individual. I know Leinster fans made an issue of how he used to almost mock apposing teams when announcing a winning Leinster score and he's stopped, but still, I hate the fool.
What annoys me most about the stadium announcer is what he doesn't do. I know I''m a stat nerd but it wouldn't be too difficult for him to either look up or ask LR to provide stats on things like number of games played by players and the number of tries and/or points scored - especially for those who haven't yet scored for Leinster.

For example, in the match against Scarlets Andrew Goodman kicked a penalty after about 3 minutes - the first points he scored for us - wouldn't it have been nice if, when saying "Penalty for Leinster scored by Andrew Goodman", the announcer had added that it was his first score. Then, about 30 minutes later, Goodman scored his 1st Leinster try - again an opportunity to personalise the announcements.
#LiveLifeLoveLeinster

#BeSeenBeHeardBeBlueBELIEVE



I'm a Book Mark and damn proud of it. Storm 1:08 forever
User avatar
Mickado
Knowledgeable
Posts: 494
Joined: May 10th, 2009, 5:30 pm

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by Mickado »

Given that Leinster have signed a 20 year lease on the place is there any chance that any of the cost of redevelopment will be passed onto Leinster? I.e. will tickets prices go up? I know they haven't raised them in a few years.
Can I raise a practical question at this point? Are we gonna do "Stonehenge" tomorrow?
User avatar
johng
Gordon D'Arcy
Posts: 18883
Joined: March 23rd, 2009, 10:37 pm
Location: Behind You!!

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by johng »

Mickado wrote:Given that Leinster have signed a 20 year lease on the place is there any chance that any of the cost of redevelopment will be passed onto Leinster? I.e. will tickets prices go up? I know they haven't raised them in a few years.
The ST has gone up this year.
User avatar
Mickado
Knowledgeable
Posts: 494
Joined: May 10th, 2009, 5:30 pm

Re: Sneak Peak - RDS Redevelopment Plans

Post by Mickado »

johng wrote:
Mickado wrote:Given that Leinster have signed a 20 year lease on the place is there any chance that any of the cost of redevelopment will be passed onto Leinster? I.e. will tickets prices go up? I know they haven't raised them in a few years.
The ST has gone up this year.
I knew I should have been reading those mails coming in...Has anyone got the number for Joe Duffy?
Can I raise a practical question at this point? Are we gonna do "Stonehenge" tomorrow?
Post Reply