The 2012-13 Sexton would be the most important player in Ireland; I am really not sure this iteration is the most important player on our roster.Dave Cahill wrote:Two reasons. Firstly, the game against Toulon is meaningless, its less important now than the game against Moseley was back in August. So who we select doesn't really matter. Therefore why not use a dead rubber to try and run some form into a guy who is, and this is the second reason, the most important player on our roster and who, even if playing at half his capacity is considerably better than any other option we have. If the next game were a Pro12 game, or the next selectorial options were in the same ballpark as JS, then my view on things would be different, but it isn't and they aren'tcurates_egg wrote:[Dave, you generally apply informed logic to all of your arguments. One mightn't agree with you but can always see where you are coming from.
On this point, I fear you are maybe letting emotion cloud your judgement and not applying the same logic to this player/situation you would to others.
Specifically, you would consistently argue that players underperforming should be dropped and that coaches picking underperforming players on reputation were wrong. This is logically very sound.
So, why do you not apply it to Sexton?.
I know you think he still the best ten we have no matter how he plays but I really think you are ignoring some pretty worrying signs. His passing is currently really poor - behind players, into touch, over their heads; it is a bit of a lottery. He is not even the second best place kicker, based on percentages. He is frequently misqueuing dead ball kicks (penalties, drop offs).
Like everyone, I was excited that we were getting him back, knew he wouldn't be the same as 2012-13...but have been pretty surprised by how badly he is playing.
What if he plays the same again? What would it take for you to say: actually, no - he really needs a break, as this playing him into form lark is not working?