Mick Kearney

A forum for true blue Leinster supporters to talk about and support their team

Moderator: moderators

User avatar
outcast eddie
Mullet
Posts: 1041
Joined: June 18th, 2009, 9:45 pm

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by outcast eddie »

goreyguy wrote:
hugonaut wrote:
goreyguy wrote:Mick Kearney will never be Nathan Hines..
.. is neither here nor there. Give me . or give me ...
someone mentioned a nathan hines sized hole in the squad, i'd thought it prudent to mention that that hole could not be filled by Mick Kearney.
I was generalising about our second rows. So far this year we have seen stand out performances from individuals within the front row union, the back row, the half backs and the speedsters but the second rowers are conspicuous by their lack of eye-catching moments. Some credible performances yes, but nothing for the highlight reels that I can think of offhand.
The odds are good but the goods are odd.
User avatar
riocard911
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5993
Joined: July 27th, 2015, 10:42 pm

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by riocard911 »

@ leinsterforever: That's a dreadful accusation to make and IMO quite unjustified. I couldn't care less what colour Lawes, Armitage, Marler, Meelamu, Pape et al are. Guys who carry out cheap shots are low life to me - regardless of their ethnic origins or the pigment of their skin. Just because I managed to get two coloured guys mixed up doesn't make me a racist. If it was BO'D had done the same thing to Lawes, I would be similarly unimpressed and just as condemning. Perhaps you could try to not be quite so presumptuous, before you name call someone like that in the future.
leinsterforever
Mullet
Posts: 1591
Joined: March 18th, 2015, 1:20 am

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by leinsterforever »

riocard911 wrote:@ leinsterforever: That's a dreadful accusation to make and IMO quite unjustified. I couldn't care less what colour Lawes, Armitage, Marler, Meelamu, Pape et al are. Guys who carry out cheap shots are low life to me - regardless of their ethnic origins or the pigment of their skin. Just because I managed to get two coloured guys mixed up doesn't make me a racist. If it was BO'D had done the same thing to Lawes, I would be similarly unimpressed and just as condemning. Perhaps you could try to not be quite so presumptuous, before you name call someone like that in the future.
Dude, I was joking. I don't think you're a racist
User avatar
riocard911
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5993
Joined: July 27th, 2015, 10:42 pm

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by riocard911 »

leinsterforever wrote:
riocard911 wrote:@ leinsterforever: That's a dreadful accusation to make and IMO quite unjustified. I couldn't care less what colour Lawes, Armitage, Marler, Meelamu, Pape et al are. Guys who carry out cheap shots are low life to me - regardless of their ethnic origins or the pigment of their skin. Just because I managed to get two coloured guys mixed up doesn't make me a racist. If it was BO'D had done the same thing to Lawes, I would be similarly unimpressed and just as condemning. Perhaps you could try to not be quite so presumptuous, before you name call someone like that in the future.
Dude, I was joking. I don't think you're a racist
I'm delighted to hear that. You had me worried there for a minute.....
User avatar
cormac
Rob Kearney
Posts: 7772
Joined: May 24th, 2006, 2:05 pm
Location: The Moon

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by cormac »

riocard911 wrote:
leinsterforever wrote:
riocard911 wrote:@ leinsterforever: That's a dreadful accusation to make and IMO quite unjustified. I couldn't care less what colour Lawes, Armitage, Marler, Meelamu, Pape et al are. Guys who carry out cheap shots are low life to me - regardless of their ethnic origins or the pigment of their skin. Just because I managed to get two coloured guys mixed up doesn't make me a racist. If it was BO'D had done the same thing to Lawes, I would be similarly unimpressed and just as condemning. Perhaps you could try to not be quite so presumptuous, before you name call someone like that in the future.
Dude, I was joking. I don't think you're a racist
I'm delighted to hear that. You had me worried there for a minute.....
Your original post (mistaking Lawes for Armitage) and then when corrected responding with "I got my thugs mixed up there" does read really poorly and could easily be misconstrued as racism by people reading it. You've clarified it since which is fair enough but when I read it initially it did leave me wondering.
Look out Itchy, he's Irish
User avatar
riocard911
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5993
Joined: July 27th, 2015, 10:42 pm

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by riocard911 »

@cormac: Fair point.
User avatar
Grumpy Old Man
Shane Jennings
Posts: 6636
Joined: February 22nd, 2006, 3:22 pm
Location: Home for the Slightly Bewildered

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by Grumpy Old Man »

I yield to no man in my disdain for Delon Armitage. Not sure what that makes me, but anyone with a problem with it can FRO.
A proud Winsome Fluter
User avatar
simonokeeffe
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 16777
Joined: July 21st, 2011, 3:04 am
Location: Dublin
Contact:

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by simonokeeffe »

Lawes has matured massively as a player, Felon Armitage never did
Retired from babbling. Can be found on twittter @okeeffesimon
User avatar
riocard911
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5993
Joined: July 27th, 2015, 10:42 pm

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by riocard911 »

simonokeeffe wrote:Lawes has matured massively as a player, Felon Armitage never did
He is a great player, no question. I'll tell you though, if he pulls one of those "late" tackles on Carberry and Stuart Barnes tries to tell us "that's perfectly legal" - I will go ****ING MAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
User avatar
simonokeeffe
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 16777
Joined: July 21st, 2011, 3:04 am
Location: Dublin
Contact:

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by simonokeeffe »

riocard911 wrote:
simonokeeffe wrote:Lawes has matured massively as a player, Felon Armitage never did
He is a great player, no question. I'll tell you though, if he pulls one of those "late" tackles on Carberry and Stuart Barnes tries to tell us "that's perfectly legal" - I will go ****ING MAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Would agree but thought he'd cut them out?
Retired from babbling. Can be found on twittter @okeeffesimon
User avatar
hugonaut
Shane Jennings
Posts: 7141
Joined: May 5th, 2009, 7:44 pm

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by hugonaut »

goreyguy wrote:
hugonaut wrote:
goreyguy wrote:Mick Kearney will never be Nathan Hines..
.. is neither here nor there. Give me . or give me ...
someone mentioned a nathan hines sized hole in the squad, i'd thought it prudent to mention that that hole could not be filled by Mick Kearney.
I'm just commenting on your punctuation habit of using two dots – I never know if you're making a definitive statement [i.e. ending with a single full stop] or leaving it open to interpretation [ending with an ellipsis].
User avatar
Oldschoolsocks
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4935
Joined: January 4th, 2015, 10:36 am
Location: Stepping out of the Supernova

Mick Kearney

Post by Oldschoolsocks »

leinsterforever wrote:
riocard911 wrote:
leinsterforever wrote: You mean the cheap shot on BOD by Delon Armitage?
You're right. I got me thugs mixed up there. Thanks.
Racist
But neither are members of the legendary Indian death cult.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
bamboozle
Bookworm
Posts: 214
Joined: September 16th, 2008, 2:20 pm

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by bamboozle »

leinsterforever wrote:
Ruckedtobits wrote:
outcast eddie wrote:Was just thinking yesterday that there's still a Nathan Hines sized hole in our squad. None of our locks are putting in MoTM performances this season (I make this statement without any research thus firing the starting pistol for the forum statos ). It's a big weakness when facing up to a team with a talent like Lawes and don't get me started on last weekends lineout performance.
Reservation (AND FONT SIZE NOTED) but beg to disagree as Nagle has been playing very well as has Molony, although he lacks the absolute physique of Mike Mc or Kearney. The only one of our second-rows who has disappointed in the Blue jersey is our Maori, who has been competent but never really abrasive or dominating. Very keen to see Kearney back in harness but more than satisfied with what Nagle is producing so far.
I think Triggs has been good when he's played this season
Ricky Flutey also had a cheap hit on BOD in that match.
User avatar
Laighin Break
Mullet
Posts: 1830
Joined: May 3rd, 2012, 9:35 am
Location: Scandinavia

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by Laighin Break »

simonokeeffe wrote:
riocard911 wrote:
simonokeeffe wrote:Lawes has matured massively as a player, Felon Armitage never did
He is a great player, no question. I'll tell you though, if he pulls one of those "late" tackles on Carberry and Stuart Barnes tries to tell us "that's perfectly legal" - I will go ****ING MAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Would agree but thought he'd cut them out?
Well this "huge hit" on Plisson, who's about half his size, was only a year and a bit go - Let the debate begin:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiIUeVsdeiw
User avatar
Flash Gordon
Leo Cullen
Posts: 11708
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 3:31 pm

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by Flash Gordon »

jezzer wrote:Our lifting against Dragons looked very messy. Hardly surprising given personnel and lack of playing time together.
In fairness James Tracey's loopy throwing didn't help matter! Unreal player with an incredible workrate and is virtually another backrow option but his throwing against the dragons was very poor.
Flash ahhhh ahhh, he'll save every one of us
User avatar
Flash Gordon
Leo Cullen
Posts: 11708
Joined: February 7th, 2006, 3:31 pm

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by Flash Gordon »

riocard911 wrote:
leinsterforever wrote:
riocard911 wrote:@ leinsterforever: That's a dreadful accusation to make and IMO quite unjustified. I couldn't care less what colour Lawes, Armitage, Marler, Meelamu, Pape et al are. Guys who carry out cheap shots are low life to me - regardless of their ethnic origins or the pigment of their skin. Just because I managed to get two coloured guys mixed up doesn't make me a racist. If it was BO'D had done the same thing to Lawes, I would be similarly unimpressed and just as condemning. Perhaps you could try to not be quite so presumptuous, before you name call someone like that in the future.
Dude, I was joking. I don't think you're a racist
I'm delighted to hear that. You had me worried there for a minute.....
Think it's a reference to Felon's penchant for accusing opposition players of being racist unjustly. Ulster's Matt McCullough was accused by Felon of racist abuse after McCullough accused him of having a "face on him like a Lisburn Spide" (Spide being Ulster for knacker). Felon took this as McCullough calling him a similar term which is used for racist abuse and tried to kick in the door of the Ulster dressing room. Personally, I think they should have opened the door, let him in and locked it.....

At the subsequent disciplinary hearing London Irish were urged to apologise to Ulster for the slur. Bizarrely, nobody thought to request an apology to Lisburn Spides for the humiliating and slanderous association with Deoln Armitage.
Flash ahhhh ahhh, he'll save every one of us
User avatar
Oldschoolsocks
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4935
Joined: January 4th, 2015, 10:36 am
Location: Stepping out of the Supernova

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by Oldschoolsocks »

Laighin Break wrote:
Well this "huge hit" on Plisson, who's about half his size, was only a year and a bit go - Let the debate begin:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiIUeVsdeiw
No need for debate, he's a scummy POS
All Blacks nil
Mullet
Posts: 1920
Joined: December 15th, 2013, 10:52 pm

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by All Blacks nil »

Well this "huge hit" on Plisson, who's about half his size, was only a year and a bit go - Let the debate begin:
Should a ref consider the size of the opposition when considering the legality of a tackle!!!!!!
one man's beast is another man's villain
User avatar
suisse
Shane Jennings
Posts: 5088
Joined: April 2nd, 2007, 12:23 am
Location: Seoul, South Korea
Contact:

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by suisse »

hugonaut wrote: I'm just commenting on your punctuation habit of using two dots – I never know if you're making a definitive statement [i.e. ending with a single full stop] or leaving it open to interpretation [ending with an ellipsis].
I think the idea is to leave the statement hanging. A single . or a ! essentially means' case closed, move on quickly'. However, multiple .... means 'my opinion is clear but I want to give it extra effect but letting it hang for a moment.'
User avatar
curates_egg
Seán Cronin
Posts: 3725
Joined: November 29th, 2011, 3:50 pm
Location: Brussels, Belgium

Re: Mick Kearney

Post by curates_egg »

suisse wrote:
hugonaut wrote: I'm just commenting on your punctuation habit of using two dots – I never know if you're making a definitive statement [i.e. ending with a single full stop] or leaving it open to interpretation [ending with an ellipsis].
I think the idea is to leave the statement hanging. A single . or a ! essentially means' case closed, move on quickly'. However, multiple .... means 'my opinion is clear but I want to give it extra effect but letting it hang for a moment.'
Nah, Hugo is right. It's one 'dot' or three.
Now we wait for goreyguy's response ...
Post Reply