Contracts

A forum for true blue Leinster supporters to talk about and support their team

Moderator: moderators

User avatar
Lar
Mullet
Posts: 1694
Joined: May 18th, 2011, 6:18 pm
Location: Dublin

Re: Contracts

Post by Lar »

simonokeeffe wrote:The earth is flat
I do not believe you are correct.
Four Stars
User avatar
artaneboy
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4163
Joined: January 25th, 2011, 7:46 pm
Location: closer than you think...

Contracts

Post by artaneboy »

Keith wrote:
blockhead wrote:
paddyor wrote: Also rumousr doing the rounds that
1)Jackson and Olding are getting P45s irrespective of the outcome of the trial
b)They want out of Belfast if they're found innocent
Wow. That would be a terrible shame (if they are found innocent) to be basically run out of their home province. I'd say in those circumstances they would not be interested in playing for any of the other 3 provinces. Jackson would be snapped up, Olding too by the french or english clubs.
They are probably right though. Chad Evans (footballer) was found innocent but his name is still tarnished by the court case and still receives awful abuse from fans. I would want them to stay but I can see the reason why they would go abroad.
Post error


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited by artaneboy on January 17th, 2018, 7:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Oh, I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused!"
User avatar
artaneboy
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4163
Joined: January 25th, 2011, 7:46 pm
Location: closer than you think...

Re: Contracts

Post by artaneboy »

Totally not referencing the case in point, but a criminal court does not find you “innocent”, it may find you “not guilty.” There’s a real difference- and that’s the issue with living with the situation afterwards.

Peculiar alright that Issac Boss also fell foul of the same charge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"Oh, I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused!"
User avatar
Dave Cahill
Devin Toner
Posts: 25499
Joined: January 24th, 2006, 3:32 pm
Location: None of your damn business
Contact:

Re: Contracts

Post by Dave Cahill »

artaneboy wrote:Totally not referencing the case in point, but a criminal court does not find you “innocent”, it may find you “not guilty.” There’s a real difference- and that’s the issue with living with the situation afterwards.

Peculiar alright that Issac Boss also fell foul of the same charge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A criminal court doesn't need to find you innocent as you're already innocent and presumed to be innocent until and unless you're found to be guilty.
I have Bumbleflex
User avatar
artaneboy
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4163
Joined: January 25th, 2011, 7:46 pm
Location: closer than you think...

Contracts

Post by artaneboy »

Dave Cahill wrote:
artaneboy wrote:Totally not referencing the case in point, but a criminal court does not find you “innocent”, it may find you “not guilty.” There’s a real difference- and that’s the issue with living with the situation afterwards.

Peculiar alright that Issac Boss also fell foul of the same charge.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
A criminal court doesn't need to find you innocent as you're already innocent and presumed to be innocent until and unless you're found to be guilty.
But of a rabbit hole this one- but just for a moment. It doesn’t matter what it “needs” to do; in point of fact (and it’s no accident) the court finds you ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’. The prosecution needs to prove its case to the court with a high standard of certainty.

The totally correct necessity for a sufficient burden of proof to get a criminal conviction means that everyone knows a jury’s declaration acquitting someone, doesn’t necessarily mean the person didn’t commit the crime: rather it wasn’t proved.

There are plenty of high profile cases of that, where even the acquitted person has subsequently admitted their culpability. So a declaration of “not guilty” as opposed to innocence is how the law and society deals with that unarticulated but undeniable reality.

Now that the “double jeopardy” principle has been eroded I expect this to become clearer when we have retrials of people previously declared not guilty as new evidence emerges. But right or wrong, that’s probably enough on that...
"Oh, I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused!"
Leinsterlunatic
Bookworm
Posts: 127
Joined: July 19th, 2017, 10:52 am

Re: Contracts

Post by Leinsterlunatic »

simonokeeffe wrote:The earth is flat
No it's not.

It's quite clearly a triangle.
User avatar
Peg Leg
Rob Kearney
Posts: 9823
Joined: February 1st, 2010, 5:08 pm
Location: Procrastinasia
Contact:

Re: Contracts

Post by Peg Leg »

Leinsterlunatic wrote:
simonokeeffe wrote:The earth is flat
No it's not.

It's quite clearly a triangle.
I think he meant PH, phlat.
"It was Mrs O'Leary's cow"
Daniel Sullivan
User avatar
LeRouxIsPHat
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 15008
Joined: January 22nd, 2009, 7:49 pm

Re: Contracts

Post by LeRouxIsPHat »

That a dig at me?
User avatar
simonokeeffe
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 16777
Joined: July 21st, 2011, 3:04 am
Location: Dublin
Contact:

Re: Contracts

Post by simonokeeffe »

LeRouxIsPHat wrote:That a dig at me?
I think we're going to need a bigger shovel

Think this has gone from being about Leinster contracts to Law & Order very quickly. F all chance of Byrne or Carberry moving.
Retired from babbling. Can be found on twittter @okeeffesimon
User avatar
Peg Leg
Rob Kearney
Posts: 9823
Joined: February 1st, 2010, 5:08 pm
Location: Procrastinasia
Contact:

Re: Contracts

Post by Peg Leg »

LeRouxIsPHat wrote:That a dig at me?
I'm not sure. It certainly was not when I wrote it, but I'll leave it up to you to decide. [GRINNING FACE WITH SMILING EYES]
"It was Mrs O'Leary's cow"
Daniel Sullivan
User avatar
LeRouxIsPHat
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 15008
Joined: January 22nd, 2009, 7:49 pm

Re: Contracts

Post by LeRouxIsPHat »

Peg Leg wrote:
LeRouxIsPHat wrote:That a dig at me?
I'm not sure. It certainly was not when I wrote it, but I'll leave it up to you to decide. [GRINNING FACE WITH SMILING EYES]
Reported.

6 week ban for Peg Leg please, down to 5 and a half if he pleads guilty.
User avatar
simonokeeffe
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 16777
Joined: July 21st, 2011, 3:04 am
Location: Dublin
Contact:

Re: Contracts

Post by simonokeeffe »

LeRouxIsPHat wrote:
Peg Leg wrote:
LeRouxIsPHat wrote:That a dig at me?
I'm not sure. It certainly was not when I wrote it, but I'll leave it up to you to decide. [GRINNING FACE WITH SMILING EYES]
Reported.

6 week ban for Peg Leg please, down to 5 and a half if he pleads guilty.
He will definitely wear chinos to the hearing and eat all the biscuits
Retired from babbling. Can be found on twittter @okeeffesimon
User avatar
Oldschool
Cian Healy
Posts: 14510
Joined: March 27th, 2008, 1:10 pm

Re: Contracts

Post by Oldschool »

Think you might have missed the citing window.
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall who's the greatest player of them all? It is Drico your majesty.
User avatar
Oldschoolsocks
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4929
Joined: January 4th, 2015, 10:36 am
Location: Stepping out of the Supernova

Re: Contracts

Post by Oldschoolsocks »

paddyor wrote:
mildlyinterested wrote:...They want out of Belfast if they're found innocent
a defendant cannot be found innocent - the choice is guilty or not guilty

I know, I know pedantry and all that, but it's an important distinction
FLIP
Seán Cronin
Posts: 3111
Joined: May 22nd, 2009, 1:00 am

Re: Contracts

Post by FLIP »

Oldschoolsocks wrote:
paddyor wrote:
mildlyinterested wrote:...They want out of Belfast if they're found innocent
a defendant cannot be found innocent - the choice is guilty or not guilty

I know, I know pedantry and all that, but it's an important distinction
Also an important distinction is innocent until found guilty.
Anyone But New Zealand
User avatar
Peg Leg
Rob Kearney
Posts: 9823
Joined: February 1st, 2010, 5:08 pm
Location: Procrastinasia
Contact:

Re: Contracts

Post by Peg Leg »

Innocent or guilty, the #metoo movement and public sentiment following the outing of so many sex crims lately will not help their cases.
"It was Mrs O'Leary's cow"
Daniel Sullivan
User avatar
Oldschool
Cian Healy
Posts: 14510
Joined: March 27th, 2008, 1:10 pm

Re: Contracts

Post by Oldschool »

Not a legal expert.
Is it innocence or is it the presumption of innocence?
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall who's the greatest player of them all? It is Drico your majesty.
User avatar
Oldschoolsocks
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4929
Joined: January 4th, 2015, 10:36 am
Location: Stepping out of the Supernova

Re: Contracts

Post by Oldschoolsocks »

presumption of innocence - one is considered innocent unless proven guilty.
User avatar
artaneboy
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4163
Joined: January 25th, 2011, 7:46 pm
Location: closer than you think...

Re: Contracts

Post by artaneboy »

Oldschool wrote:Not a legal expert.
Is it innocence or is it the presumption of innocence?
The latter. We went through this a few days ago. You are regarded and treated legally as if you are innocent- whether in reality you are or not, until proven otherwise.

Essentially the state don’t/ cannot declare one innocent. They can find you guilty or (if the case against you is deemed not proven) declare you ‘not guilty’.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"Oh, I used to be disgusted, and now I try to be amused!"
Post Reply