Ireland v Argentina Q/F RWC 2015

[nelly the elephant]

Great performances from Jamie Heaslip and Rory Best, really heroic. KE looked very exposed at 13 and there were many indifferent displays, especially in the first quarter. Still not sure why DR didn't start in the row and IH at 6. Desperately disappointing.

Agree 100%...I'd add Jack McGrath too when he came on but those two kept it going all game(in Headship's case to the very end of the game)

[leinster4life13]

Again, if you don't think 14 men for 30 minutes and 3 points would have changed the game you are truely idiotic enough to think looking like a fool is banter.

14 men for 30 minutes? You think the props clean out was a red? Have you ever played rugby, nothing in that, barely a yellow if you are an utter wet blanket of ref. Go off and watch ballet if you dont want to watch physical play,thats what rugby is about. If it was gouging or spearing you'd have a point, a red card for that.... *** Edited by mod ***

[FLIP]

Again, if you don't think 14 men for 30 minutes and 3 points would have changed the game you are truely idiotic enough to think looking like a fool is banter.

14 men for 30 minutes? You think the props clean out was a red?

No, I think it was a clear cut yellow card which would have been a second yellow and therefore a red. Cop on.

[simonokeeffe]

.

[All Blacks nil]

Interesting analysis of Ireland's defensive woes on Sunday. Required reading.

http://www.the42.ie/ireland-defence-arg ... 2-Oct2015/

[Xanthippe]

Again, if you don't think 14 men for 30 minutes and 3 points would have changed the game you are truely idiotic enough to think looking like a fool is banter.

14 men for 30 minutes? You think the props clean out was a red? Have you ever played rugby, nothing in that, barely a yellow if you are an utter wet blanket of ref. Go off and watch ballet if you dont want to watch physical play,thats what rugby is about. If it was gouging or spearing you'd have a point, a red card for that.... *** Edited by mod ***

*** Edited by mod ***

[Hammerhead]

Totally agree with you Xantippe. Very offensive and ignorant post.

[Hammerhead]

Sorry XantHippe!

[leinster4life13]

Totally agree with you Xantippe. Very offensive and ignorant post.

*** Edited by mod ***

[fourthirtythree]

Entitled pseudo-libertarian in offensively misogynistic online comments shocker.

Internationally they make an awful lot of noise, but when you parse the numbers from gamergate etc. they really are a tiny, tiny number of sad f%~ks.

[leinster4life13]

lol is that directed at me?

[RoboProp]

lol is that directed at me?

Oy vey, you're in trouble when you use the Donald to back you up

[simonokeeffe]

lol is that directed at me?

Oy vey, you're in trouble when you use the Donald to back you up

complete tangent but some journalists worked out Trump would be worth at least twice as much money if he just put what he inherited into a standard investment account than launched all his business ventures

[Fireworks]

Again, if you don't think 14 men for 30 minutes and 3 points would have changed the game you are truely idiotic enough to think looking like a fool is banter.

14 men for 30 minutes? You think the props clean out was a red? Have you ever played rugby, nothing in that, barely a yellow if you are an utter wet blanket of ref. Go off and watch ballet if you dont want to watch physical play,thats what rugby is about. If it was gouging or spearing you'd have a point, a red card for that.... *** Edited by mod ***

*** Edited by mod ***

The post includes both the offensive and the inaccurate. It shows a lack of attention whatever about the rules of the game. Has he ever played the game???

[Twist]

Entitled pseudo-libertarian in offensively misogynistic online comments shocker.

Internationally they make an awful lot of noise, but when you parse the numbers from gamergate etc. they really are a tiny, tiny number of sad f%~ks.

Can anyone make sense of this for me??

[Oldschoolsocks]

Entitled pseudo-libertarian in offensively misogynistic online comments shocker.

Internationally they make an awful lot of noise, but when you parse the numbers from gamergate etc. they really are a tiny, tiny number of sad f%~ks.

Can anyone make sense of this for me??

Not worth the bother really, but if you insist on knowing:one of the gentlemen posting here clearly does not know the laws of the game, but has a promising career ahead as a keyboard warrior which is good because he has everything you need for that pursuit.

1: offensive phraseology
2: willingness to write in very poor taste when loosing on the facts
3: likes to attack the player rather than the ball
4: extensive use of such favourite logical fallacies such as "ad hominem" and "no true Scotsman"

I do wish him well in his new venture and am sure he will be very successful