English clubs want 5 wk 6 Nations

Forum for the discussion of all International Rugby

Moderator: moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
LENSTA
Knowledgeable
Posts: 271
Joined: October 4th, 2009, 11:38 pm

English clubs want 5 wk 6 Nations

Post by LENSTA »

http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/i ... -1.2952332

I would like to see this as well, not for the reasons the English clubs want it, but for the following reasons:

1. It would replicate the playing schedule of a RWC and so would make the 6 Nations better preparation for world cups;
2. Player attrition would enforce selection rotation thereby broadening player depth (current coach is focused on player depth but future coaches may not be);
#ScrapTheLions
User avatar
Logorrhea
Shane Horgan
Posts: 4668
Joined: October 2nd, 2007, 1:20 pm
Location: D24

Re: English clubs want 5 wk 6 Nations

Post by Logorrhea »

Player welfare should be paramount and those two week breaks can do a lot to heal the bruises. The 6 nations schedule seems good to me.
User avatar
hugonaut
Shane Jennings
Posts: 7124
Joined: May 5th, 2009, 7:44 pm

Re: English clubs want 5 wk 6 Nations

Post by hugonaut »

LENSTA wrote:http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/rugby/i ... -1.2952332

I would like to see this as well, not for the reasons the English clubs want it, but for the following reasons:

1. It would replicate the playing schedule of a RWC and so would make the 6 Nations better preparation for world cups;
2. Player attrition would enforce selection rotation thereby broadening player depth (current coach is focused on player depth but future coaches may not be);
I can't look at "player attrition" as a positive.

In any case, clearly England would have a massive advantage when it comes to squad depth, as they have at least twelve professional teams to select from [London Irish being a fully pro team in the Championship]. Why you would want to tip the scales further in their favour I don't know.
User avatar
LENSTA
Knowledgeable
Posts: 271
Joined: October 4th, 2009, 11:38 pm

Re: English clubs want 5 wk 6 Nations

Post by LENSTA »

I should explain the player attrition point a bit better. Given weekly matches, in order to avoid serious injury, and give players a chance to get over general wear and tear the team will need to be rotated to a degree. So it is not that, we are encouraging player attrition, but rather seeking to avoid it, that gives us, the benefit of a broader team selection.

De-powering England IMHO does not make Ireland or the 6 Nations, as a competition, stronger. Why are Aus generally a a lot better than Ireland given their similar player numbers and Union is their 4th sport as well? They have 2 RWC wins and have been final losers twice on other occasions. Playing BNZ/SA regularly is obviously the answer, i.e. regular exposure to high quality matches. Ire could be the northern hemisphere Aus sandwiched btwn Eng & Fra.

Eng & Fra are the 2 behemoths of world rugby in terms of player numbers and finance. Neither punches their weight at RWC level, principally due to their lack of a pyramid system with the national team on top. Therefore, condensing the 6N might give Eng some help, but it doesn't cure the fundamental issue that sees them under-perform at International level.

I realise the lack of a few fallow wknds would make Ire's job harder and probably impacts results negatively, but anything that makes the 6 Nations better preparation for RWC's is good for Ire IMO. An acceptable trade off for me, I can understand it not being every Irish fan's opinion though.
#ScrapTheLions
Post Reply