I'm saying you can't say it's special treatment until it's shown elsewhere. Also IRFU sanction every deal so it's them that has final call and perception.wixfjord wrote:I think it's objectively correct that Munster are currently getting treatment that no other province has ever received.MunsterSugar wrote: As I said if ye think that Munster are getting treatment. Grand but your point says we will never know until another scenario happens.
There's no issue having 10 NIQs if they're replacing NIQs.
Whether it happens in the future or not we'll see, but as it stands, it's unchartered waters.
You're point is basically then that 'Munster aren't getting special treatment because this might happen again in the future'? Is that it?
As to your point about 'There's no issue having 10 NIQs if they're replacing NIQs.' Is that based on your own moral perception or are you saying that this is fine within IRFU regulations?
Ulster 2015/16
Moderator: moderators
-
- Knowledgeable
- Posts: 275
- Joined: February 20th, 2017, 10:14 am
Re: Ulster 2015/16
*** Edited by mod - WUM ***
Re: Ulster 2015/16
Who did?MunsterSugar wrote: Again he said 10 are on books..
- Dave Cahill
- Devin Toner
- Posts: 25537
- Joined: January 24th, 2006, 3:32 pm
- Location: None of your damn business
- Contact:
Re: Ulster 2015/16
Pure utter rubbish. I've had enough, you're on ignoreMunsterSugar wrote:But he is Dave. So again ye can move argument to suit yourselves but do it for both. He wants to play on after this year and that's why insurance ain't telling him F Off. It's like if you have an accidentbat work insurance cover wages. So again sorry but that's thatDave Cahill wrote:No, he really isn't. Same shite munster fans were at when they signed Christian Cullan crocked, Insurance pays you to f%~k off, not to hang aroundMunsterSugar wrote: Oh but he is being paid by Insurance sir
I have Bumbleflex
Re: Ulster 2015/16
So you're saying special treatment can't be called special treatment until it's 'shown elsewhere' (and then by definition doesn't become special treatment)?MunsterSugar wrote: I'm saying you can't say it's special treatment until it's shown elsewhere.
-
- Knowledgeable
- Posts: 275
- Joined: February 20th, 2017, 10:14 am
Re: Ulster 2015/16
Good man Dave. See you can't help when you sh!t is proven wrongDave Cahill wrote:Pure utter rubbish. I've had enough, you're on ignoreMunsterSugar wrote:But he is Dave. So again ye can move argument to suit yourselves but do it for both. He wants to play on after this year and that's why insurance ain't telling him F Off. It's like if you have an accidentbat work insurance cover wages. So again sorry but that's thatDave Cahill wrote: No, he really isn't. Same shite munster fans were at when they signed Christian Cullan crocked, Insurance pays you to f%~k off, not to hang around
*** Edited by mod - WUM ***
-
- Knowledgeable
- Posts: 275
- Joined: February 20th, 2017, 10:14 am
Re: Ulster 2015/16
Paddy didwixfjord wrote:Who did?MunsterSugar wrote: Again he said 10 are on books..
*** Edited by mod - WUM ***
Re: Ulster 2015/16
Which post? Sorry I haven't been following the thread, can you point out there he said '10 on the books'?MunsterSugar wrote:Paddy didwixfjord wrote:Who did?MunsterSugar wrote: Again he said 10 are on books..
-
- Knowledgeable
- Posts: 275
- Joined: February 20th, 2017, 10:14 am
Re: Ulster 2015/16
No what I'm saying is there is no basis. Do Leinster get special treatment as they get rents paid due to not owning suitable stadium?wixfjord wrote:So you're saying special treatment can't be called special treatment until it's 'shown elsewhere' (and then by definition doesn't become special treatment)?MunsterSugar wrote: I'm saying you can't say it's special treatment until it's shown elsewhere.
*** Edited by mod - WUM ***
Re: Ulster 2015/16
The basis is they've gotten more NIQs in one season than any other province has ever had! It's fairly simple.MunsterSugar wrote:No what I'm saying is there is no basis. Do Leinster get special treatment as they get rents paid due to not owning suitable stadium?wixfjord wrote:So you're saying special treatment can't be called special treatment until it's 'shown elsewhere' (and then by definition doesn't become special treatment)?MunsterSugar wrote: I'm saying you can't say it's special treatment until it's shown elsewhere.
-
- Knowledgeable
- Posts: 275
- Joined: February 20th, 2017, 10:14 am
Re: Ulster 2015/16
But simply because of short term contracts. So not reallywixfjord wrote:The basis is they've gotten more NIQs in one season than any other province has ever had! It's fairly simple.MunsterSugar wrote:No what I'm saying is there is no basis. Do Leinster get special treatment as they get rents paid due to not owning suitable stadium?wixfjord wrote: So you're saying special treatment can't be called special treatment until it's 'shown elsewhere' (and then by definition doesn't become special treatment)?
*** Edited by mod - WUM ***
Re: Ulster 2015/16
Which post was it MS?wixfjord wrote:
Which post? Sorry I haven't been following the thread, can you point out there he said '10 on the books'?
- fourthirtythree
- Leo Cullen
- Posts: 10728
- Joined: April 12th, 2008, 11:33 pm
- Location: Eight miles high
Re: Ulster 2015/16
Ireland are beating England.
-
- Knowledgeable
- Posts: 275
- Joined: February 20th, 2017, 10:14 am
Re: Ulster 2015/16
Post 1220 in reference to Thorn. Butbas I said ye make argument to move posts. No fear of me I'm here to fight my ground [WINKING FACE]wixfjord wrote:Which post was it MS?wixfjord wrote:
Which post? Sorry I haven't been following the thread, can you point out there he said '10 on the books'?
Unless Limecat bans again for not being a Leinster fan
*** Edited by mod - WUM ***
Re: Ulster 2015/16
Nothing about 'on the books' in that. You said that in a subsequent post.MunsterSugar wrote:Post 1220 in reference to Thorn. Butbas I said ye make argument to move posts. No fear of me I'm here to fight my ground [WINKING FACE]wixfjord wrote:Which post was it MS?wixfjord wrote:
Which post? Sorry I haven't been following the thread, can you point out there he said '10 on the books'?
Unless Limecat bans again for not being a Leinster fan
-
- Knowledgeable
- Posts: 275
- Joined: February 20th, 2017, 10:14 am
Re: Ulster 2015/16
Post 1220. Its numbered. It was obvious what he meant. As I said if you want to move goalposts fair enough. Just don't go all hypocritical when its only to suitwixfjord wrote:Nothing about 'on the books' in that. You said that in a subsequent post.MunsterSugar wrote:Post 1220 in reference to Thorn. Butbas I said ye make argument to move posts. No fear of me I'm here to fight my ground [WINKING FACE]wixfjord wrote: Which post was it MS?
Unless Limecat bans again for not being a Leinster fan
*** Edited by mod - WUM ***
Re: Ulster 2015/16
Oh I know which post you're talking about thanks, but there was nothing about 'on the books' in it. You said that in a subsequent post, thus ironically, 'changing the goalposts'.MunsterSugar wrote: Post 1220. Its numbered. It was obvious what he meant. As I said if you want to move goalposts fair enough. Just don't go all hypocritical when its only to suit
Link me to the post he referenced 'on the books' in there?
No idea what that means.MunsterSugar wrote: Just don't go all hypocritical when its only to suit
-
- Knowledgeable
- Posts: 275
- Joined: February 20th, 2017, 10:14 am
Re: Ulster 2015/16
Ok not on books. But rules state actually guidelines state can't have more than 5 NIQs so guess that answers that comment yourselves.wixfjord wrote:Oh I know which post you're talking about thanks, but there was nothing about 'on the books' in it. You said that in a subsequent post, thus ironically, 'changing the goalposts'.MunsterSugar wrote: Post 1220. Its numbered. It was obvious what he meant. As I said if you want to move goalposts fair enough. Just don't go all hypocritical when its only to suit
Link me to the post he referenced 'on the books' in there?
No idea what that means.MunsterSugar wrote: Just don't go all hypocritical when its only to suit
And no point giving out about Munster getting help when Leinster have as have others.
But thanks for clearing it up with me so on NIQs [GRINNING FACE WITH SMILING EYES]
And just glad you won't get hypocritical
*** Edited by mod - WUM ***
Re: Ulster 2015/16
Good stuff.MunsterSugar wrote: Ok not on books.
-
- Knowledgeable
- Posts: 275
- Joined: February 20th, 2017, 10:14 am
Re: Ulster 2015/16
And glad you ok. Guess others may follow suit so arguing on books [WINKING FACE]wixfjord wrote:Good stuff.MunsterSugar wrote: Ok not on books.
As I say I won't run
*** Edited by mod - WUM ***
Re: Ulster 2015/16
MunsterSugar wrote:Ok not on books. But rules state actually guidelines state can't have more than 5 NIQs so guess that answers that comment yourselves.wixfjord wrote:Oh I know which post you're talking about thanks, but there was nothing about 'on the books' in it. You said that in a subsequent post, thus ironically, 'changing the goalposts'.MunsterSugar wrote: Post 1220. Its numbered. It was obvious what he meant. As I said if you want to move goalposts fair enough. Just don't go all hypocritical when its only to suit
Link me to the post he referenced 'on the books' in there?
No idea what that means.MunsterSugar wrote: Just don't go all hypocritical when its only to suit
And no point giving out about Munster getting help when Leinster have as have others.
But thanks for clearing it up with me so on NIQs [GRINNING FACE WITH SMILING EYES]
And just glad you won't get hypocritical
Ruddock's tackle stats consistently too low for me to be taken seriously as a Six Nations blindside..... Ruddock's defensive stats don't stack up. - All Blacks Nil, Jan 15th, 2014
England A 8 - 14 Ireland A, 25th Jan 2014
Ruddock(c) 19/2 Tackles
England A 8 - 14 Ireland A, 25th Jan 2014
Ruddock(c) 19/2 Tackles