Dail Reform

for general chat about stuff

Moderator: moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Oldschool
Cian Healy
Posts: 14511
Joined: March 27th, 2008, 1:10 pm

Dail Reform

Post by Oldschool »

One reform I would like to see is a limit on the total number of years the same person can be Taoiseach and as a result party leader also.
Mirror, Mirror on the Wall who's the greatest player of them all? It is Drico your majesty.
User avatar
Darce
Shane Jennings
Posts: 6149
Joined: February 22nd, 2006, 4:24 pm
Location: Gary Brown Fundamentalist Supporters' Front HQ, South West Dublin Brigade, D24 Unit

Re: Dail Reform

Post by Darce »

Remove the whip
A more powerful upper house
Requirement to attend all votes when not on Government business. Same goes for debates/sittings
Professional code of conduct for debates. Removal instantly for shouting over the CC/other members
"I don't do desserts"

Gary Brown Fundamentalist Supporters' Front
The Front Lives on
User avatar
Hippo
Rhys Ruddock
Posts: 2392
Joined: January 16th, 2007, 12:48 pm
Location: In the dark English West Midlands

Re: Dail Reform

Post by Hippo »

Remove the whip - there's an argument that you'd never actually pass any legislation and that every one-issue merchant in town, and there's plenty, would be permanently on their soap boxes.

Stronger upper house - maybe, but would need to be far more democratically accountable than the present set up.
AKA Peter O'Sullivan
User avatar
Peg Leg
Rob Kearney
Posts: 9823
Joined: February 1st, 2010, 5:08 pm
Location: Procrastinasia
Contact:

Re: Dail Reform

Post by Peg Leg »

Hippo wrote:Remove the whip - there's an argument that you'd never actually pass any legislation and that every one-issue merchant in town, and there's plenty, would be permanently on their soap boxes.

Stronger upper house - maybe, but would need to be far more democratically accountable than the present set up.
Remove the whip and who knows, we might even get a debate around the issues being addressed. Why is it that labour the coalition partners with their own mandate feel it is necessary to fall in line with every decision the "government" make, without a squeak of opposition?
"It was Mrs O'Leary's cow"
Daniel Sullivan
User avatar
fourthirtythree
Leo Cullen
Posts: 10701
Joined: April 12th, 2008, 11:33 pm
Location: Eight miles high

Re: Dail Reform

Post by fourthirtythree »

Backroom dealing is why. Enda is a real political animal.

Remove the whip and there'd be even more of that. And how would you anyway? Parties enforce discipline.
User avatar
Peg Leg
Rob Kearney
Posts: 9823
Joined: February 1st, 2010, 5:08 pm
Location: Procrastinasia
Contact:

Re: Dail Reform

Post by Peg Leg »

fourthirtythree wrote:Backroom dealing is why. Enda is a real political animal.

Remove the whip and there'd be even more of that. And how would you anyway? Parties enforce discipline.
Surely anonymous voting would result in a proper democracy and a closer representation of public opinion, rather than relying on the multitude of advisors they have to determine party policy.
"It was Mrs O'Leary's cow"
Daniel Sullivan
User avatar
ronk
Jamie Heaslip
Posts: 15810
Joined: April 9th, 2009, 12:42 am

Re: Dail Reform

Post by ronk »

Let them initiate legislation, give them a sphere of influence (not money bills). Let the president decide any difficult questions.

Allow 5 seater constituencies and have each province a constituency, possibly divide Dublin out of Leinster ( for balance). (25 senators) Have a national election at different times from general elections, possibly at local election time. Keep the NUI candidates, but remove the 11 taoiseach appointees and reform (greatly reducing) the special panels, removing the ability of senators, and TDs etc. to elect senators.

I'd aim for a seanad of 40 total. I'd possibly include a diaspora senator or senators.
User avatar
fourthirtythree
Leo Cullen
Posts: 10701
Joined: April 12th, 2008, 11:33 pm
Location: Eight miles high

Re: Dail Reform

Post by fourthirtythree »

Peg Leg wrote:
fourthirtythree wrote:Backroom dealing is why. Enda is a real political animal.

Remove the whip and there'd be even more of that. And how would you anyway? Parties enforce discipline.
Surely anonymous voting would result in a proper democracy and a closer representation of public opinion, rather than relying on the multitude of advisors they have to determine party policy.
But if they vote anonymously you don't know if they are following your instructions, and then they become even more susceptible to corporate largesse than they are now....
Post Reply