tomthefan wrote:
I'm sure Jack Dorsey and Mark Zuckerberg would agree with you anyway.
Ffs, can someone explain to me why he can't react the way he wants to react?
He explained it fully (standing up to the asshole publicly to set an example for his kids) despite not needing to explain anything to anyone.
The initial line was that there was some reason to believe he didn't also complain via the correct channels, apropos of nothing, as if doing both is mutually exclusive.
He reacted publicly and emotionally, as if that's not allowed. I'm actually disgusted at some of the victim blaming on this thread. Mostly by your post above, Tom. It's one of the most ignorant things I've ever seen on a rugby forum, and that's really saying something.
"I'd have found it more cutting if I'd been called a fat bsatard, something I've always been a little sensitive about. Nowadays because racial insults have been deemed to be about the worst thing going, anyone who's insulted in such a way is bound to feel
that they have been attacked in a particularly vicious manner and are more bruised as a result."
There's no place for this kind of thing in rugby, or anywhere else for that matter. One idiot is no reflection of Ulster fans, who are generally fantastic. The horshit online from some places is a different matter entirely.
“As you all know first prize is a Cadillac El Dorado. Anyone wanna see second prize? Second prize is a set of steak knives. Third prize is you're fired.”