ronk wrote:Munster didn't win any HCs since 2008 because they werent good enough, not because Ian Keatley wasn't good enough.
Edit: What he said
Moderator: moderators
ronk wrote:Munster didn't win any HCs since 2008 because they werent good enough, not because Ian Keatley wasn't good enough.
ronk wrote:Keatley wasn't a star on the team but he never held them back from anything. All outhalves have their good and bad days.
Repeating the trope should be embarrassing for a self-aware rugby fan.
tomthefan wrote:ronk wrote:Keatley wasn't a star on the team but he never held them back from anything. All outhalves have their good and bad days.
Repeating the trope should be embarrassing for a self-aware rugby fan.
You're the one who ought to be embarrassed with that nonsense you've written.
Your outhalf is the conductor. If he isn't a stand out player on your team then you're, by definition almost, guaranteed to never win anything.
FLIP wrote:So ROG was the reason Wales beat us in the 2011 World Cup quarters then?
tomthefan wrote:ronk wrote:Keatley wasn't a star on the team but he never held them back from anything. All outhalves have their good and bad days.
Repeating the trope should be embarrassing for a self-aware rugby fan.
You're the one who ought to be embarrassed with that nonsense you've written.
Your outhalf is the conductor. If he isn't a stand out player on your team then you're, by definition almost, guaranteed to never win anything.
tomthefan wrote:ronk wrote:Keatley wasn't a star on the team but he never held them back from anything. All outhalves have their good and bad days.
Repeating the trope should be embarrassing for a self-aware rugby fan.
You're the one who ought to be embarrassed with that nonsense you've written.
Your outhalf is the conductor. If he isn't a stand out player on your team then you're, by definition almost, guaranteed to never win anything.
tomthefan wrote:Not sure what point you think you're making there hugonaut. Could you expand on it please?
tomthefan wrote:Not sure what point you think you're making there hugonaut. Could you expand on it please?
ronk wrote:tomthefan wrote:Not sure what point you think you're making there hugonaut. Could you expand on it please?
He said that there's more than one route to success: Munster can find it if they widen their understanding of rugby.
hugonaut wrote:tomthefan wrote:Not sure what point you think you're making there hugonaut. Could you expand on it please?
I would have thought it's pretty obvious, but I'll walk you through it.
"If [your outhalf] isn't a stand out player on your team then you're, by definition almost, guaranteed to never win anything."
Butch James wasn't a stand-out player on the Boks side that won RWC 2007. He'd been dropped in Nov 2002 and didn't play test rugby again until July 2006 ... more than three and a half years. His scoring contribution to SA's RWC win totalled 9 points - two conversions against the U.S. Eagles and a try against Fiji. There were guys like Os du Randt, John Smit, Bakkies Botha, Victor Matfield, Fourie du Preez, Bryan Habana and Percy Montgomerie in the team, all of whom have considerably more caps, acclaim, honours etc. than James – they were 'stand-out' players.
But James started six games of the tournament at outhalf, and SA won the tournament. So they didn't need a stand-out player at outhalf to win the toughest trophy in world rugby.
NZ did the same four years later. Dan Carter played in two games of the tournament, got injured and then New Zealand won the tournament with a mix of Colin Slade, Aaron Cruden and Stephen Donald playing outhalf, none of them stand-out players by comparison with their team-mates [McCaw, Kaino, Thorn, Nonu, Smyth, Read, Woodcock, Mealamu etc.]
Austin Healy [2002] and Yann Delaigue [2003] both won HECs at No10. Healy started one test match in his entire career at outhalf, and Delaige played one test match [at centre] for the middle eight years of his career, from October 1995 to June 2003. Alex King, with his 5 English caps [1 start] won two European cups. They were in talented, well-coached teams and they won. It's do-able.
ronk wrote:2 of the last 3 World Cups. Carefully selective all right, funny how no evidence whatsoever beats several examples at different levels. It's rare for top teams to be weak at outhalf so it should be much rarer. Elite teams usually aren't weak in any positions.
Is Gareth Anscombe a World class star, but he's a game away from a Slam, was Priestland a stand out for Wales. Do they pass the Lions test?
At the last RWC we missed Sexton against Argentina but we missed the others just as much. I don't think it was Madigan's fault we lost.
Byrne was rushed into HC starts for Leinster before he was ready but we managed. Carbery came on against Scotland and wasn't trusted to kick from hand. Munster could have won a HC with Keatley.
Particularly as JS selected Keatley as cover for J10 and played him off the bench in 2017 November internationals. Munster's loss is LI gain.
Even if you're right, it doesn't explain why Keatley went from 1st. (Maybe 2nd) choice to distant 5th choice. If the situation was reversed he'd be a strong candidate for a legends shirt.
We're a long way from almost never.
tomthefan wrote:Hugonaut
Thanks.
I still don't think SA would have won in 2007, nor NZ in 2011 with Ian Keatley at outhalf, just a suspicion I have.
Users browsing this forum: dropkick and 2 guests